|

International Meat Crisis
OBTAINING ADEQUATE PROTEIN
This chapter deals with the following points: How
much protein does a healthy person need? Are there any dangers in eating
a high-protein diet? How much protein is assimilated from a meat diet,
as opposed to a vegetarian one? Which is the best source of protein?
IMPORTANCE OF PROTEIN—Protein
was first identified as a food nutrient in 1838. Protein is needed for
muscle function, hormone synthesis, and the production of enzymes. Aside
from water, a great proportion of what is in your body is either protein
or bone. Growth and repair both require an adequate protein intake.
Protein is built up from amino acids. Of the 20 amino
acids in your body, eight are "essential"; that is, they
cannot be made within your body. You must get them from the food you
eat. The other 12 can be made from those eight.
The issue is not the importance of protein in our
diet; all are agreed on that. The question is which is the better
protein in our diet: vegetables or meat? Here are some facts:
BETTER ON LOW-PROTEIN DIET—Earlier in the 20th
century, Dr. Russell Chittenden, of Yale University, was a leading
athletic trainer. He was one of the first to challenge the nutritional
theory, that animal-based foods provided the best strength and energy.
Chittenden conducted at least three studies that examined the question
of whether meat and high protein were really necessary for optimal
performance. One involved a study of well-trained athletes.
At the beginning of the study, all were on a typical
meat diet. Chittenden had them switch to a plant-based diet for five
months. At the end of the study period when their fitness levels were
reanalyzed, the athletes had improved a striking 35%! As Campbell,
another researcher, later commented, "only the dietary change could
have accounted for these remarkable results."
A recent discussion of Chittenden’s research can be
found in T.C. Campbell, Muscling out the meat myth, New Century
Nutrition, July 1996. Dr. Campbell, Professor of Nutritional
Biochemistry at Cornell University, is the director of the massive
Cornell-Oxford-China Diet and Health Project.
In their classic study in the 1960s, Mervin Hardinge
and his team at Loma Linda University analyzed the complete diets of
three groups: meat-eating Americans, lacto-ovo vegetarians (who also eat
dairy products and eggs), and vegans. The research team found that
the vegans obtained the best mix of essential amino acids, the
vegetarians came in second best, and the meat eaters a poor third (M.G.
Hardinge, H. Crooks, F.J. Stare, "Nutritional Studies of
Vegetarians," Journal of the American Dietetic Association, January
1966).
HIGH-PROTEIN DIET ELIMINATES CALCIUM—An important
point concerns the fact that humans do not need a high-protein diet, and
it is actually not good for them!
A high-protein diet robs the body of calcium. Healthy
young adult men were given carefully controlled diets for nearly four
months. During this entire time, they were consuming 1,400 mg. of
calcium daily. Their protein intake was also carefully regulated. Test
studies revealed that those who ate 48 g. [grams] of protein per day
gained 20 mg. [milligrams] of calcium each day. Those who ate 95 g. lost
30 mg. of calcium. Those who ate 142 g. lost 70 mg. of calcium (H.
Linkswiler, M.B. Zemel, et al., "Protein-induced hypercalciuria,"
Federal Proceedings, July 1981).
The researchers concluded their study with this
statement: "The calcium loss of 84 mg. daily, which occurred
when the high-protein diet was fed, was substantial and, if continued
over a period of time, would result in considerable loss of body
calcium." The average American intake of protein is 105 g. per
day (USDA, Home Economic Research Report, No. 52, September 1994).
Where did that calcium, lost to the body by eating
too much protein, come from? It came from their bone reserves. This
is an obvious conclusion, since 99% of the calcium in our bodies is in
our bones. The high-protein intake group was losing calcium every day,
simply because of their high protein consumption. The excessive
protein was leaching calcium from bones, even though they were getting
plenty of calcium in their diet (1,400 mg. of calcium daily, when
the RDA recommended daily allowance is 1000 mg. for women). In contrast,
those on the lower-protein diet helped maintain thicker and stronger
bones.
HIGH-PROTEIN DIET LEADS TO OSTEOPOROSIS—Two
University of Wisconsin researchers, Richard Mazess and Warren Mather,
found that Eskimos over the age of 40 have 10%-15% more bone loss
than white Americans in the same age range (R.B. Mazess and W.
Mather, "Bone mineral content of North Alaskan Eskimos,"
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 1974). Checking on
their diet, they found the Eskimos eat more meat than even average
Americans. They also found the Eskimos, with their fish, walrus and
whale diet, get a very large amount of calcium from that meat (2,500 mg.
daily), yet they lose more calcium than they take in. "The most
obvious factor in the . . higher rate of bone loss in middle-aged
Eskimos would be their meat diet" (ibid.).
These and other studies clearly show that bone
loss and osteoporosis is NOT related to a lack of calcium in the diet.
The bigger problem is eating too much protein. If you are eating too
much of it, you can eat all the high-calcium foods you want (such as
vegetables and milk), yet your bone density will continue to decrease to
dangerous levels. Western nations, which consume the most meat, have
the highest rate of hip fractures (B.J. Abelow, T.R. Holford, K.L.
Insogna, "Cross-cultural association between dietary animal protein
and hip fracture," Calciferous Tissue, January 1992).
MEAT ACIDS CAUSE THE BONE LOSS—Research points to
the large quantities of acids in meat as the cause of the calcium loss
(W.J. Craig, "The Calcium Craze," Nutrition for the Nineties,
1992, pp. 131-146). As the blood becomes more acid, the blood
takes calcium from the bones to neutralize the acidity. Increased
calcium in the urine then provides a telltale sign of this bone loss (R.B.
Mazess and W. Mather, "Bone mineral content of North Alaskan
Eskimos," American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 1974).
As noted earlier, it is the major meat-eating nations
of the Western world which have the most hip fractures (B.J. Abelow,
ibid.). An extensive study by four major research centers, working
together, analyzed the risk of hip fracture in nearly 10,000 white women
over 65. They found that a low-calcium intake—even below 400 mg.
per day—did not cause hip fractures (S.R. Cummings, M.C. Nevitt,
et al., "Risk factors for hip fracture in white women," New
England Journal of Medicine, March 1995).
Interestingly enough, higher consumption of
vegetable protein does not appear to be related to osteoporosis or bone
fractures (D. Feskanich, W.C. Willert, et al., "Protein
consumption and bone fractures in women," American Journal of
Epidemiology, March 1996).
Although calcium intake and hip fractures are
unrelated in many studies, some studies have shown that an increase
in calcium intake can prevent osteoporosis, particularly when the
calcium consumption is adequate and the protein intake is relatively low
before the age of 30 (R.R. Recker, K.M. Davies, et al., "Bone
gain in young adult women," Journal of the American Medical
Association, November 1992).
For your information, soy beans and greens are a
good natural source of calcium. Some green leafy vegetables (such as
collards and lambs-quarters) have even more calcium per serving than
soybeans. All the calcium a person needs can be obtained from the
vegetable kingdom.
In addition, more calcium is assimilated from
vegetables than from dairy products or meat, because vegetables contain
less phosphorus. The excess phosphorus in a meal tends to lock with
calcium, in that meal, and carry it out of the body.

|